Skip to content

minimally invasive screw type tooth replacement

A comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological outcomes of implants placed in augmented and non augmented extraction sites using guided implant surgery :A controlled clinical trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/09/021168
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-09-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Guided Implant Surgery: The implant sites were prepared according to the manufacturerâ??s guidelines using a DIOnavi concept i.e. digital navigation implant surgery through 3D computer

Sponsors

DR PSG PRAKASH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Patients with age ranging from 19 -50 years. 2)Patients not contraindicated for periodontal surgical procedures. 3)Patients who have given written and verbal informed consent for the study. 4)Isolated edentulous sites from Maxillary anteriors and premolars with single rooted edentulous sites were taken for the study. 5)The choice of patient selection for socket Augmented group are the patients with a previous history of extraction followed by socket augmentation with Bio active synthetic glass bone graft and left to heal for a minimum of six months at the time of evaluation. 6)The choice of patient selection for Non Augmented group are , the patients with a history of previous extraction followed by spontaneous healing for a minimum of 6 months at the time of evaluation. 7)The patients who presented with a single edentulous site having a minimum bone height >= 9mm and bone width >= 4mm evaluated through CBCT bounded on either side by healthy natural teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Chronic therapy under non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Bisphosphonates and Corticosteroids. 2)Current smokers ( >10 cigarettes per day). 3)Evidence of loss of any bony wall at the time of extraction or during socket augmentation. 4)The extractions other than the following reasons will be excluded: •Extraction of teeth due to Failure of endodontic treatment. •Extraction due to Fracture of tooth due to trauma and the fracture line extending subgingivally which cannot be restored endodontically. •Tooth with poor prognosis (grossly decayed). •Residual root stumps. 5)Pregnancy. 6)Untreated periodontitis. 7)Para-functional habits. 8)Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients. 9)Active infection or severe inflammation at the implant placement site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Mean Crestal bone level measurements to be assessed at 1 year with standardized radiographs. 2.Implant survival rates to be assessed at 1 year with radiographic and clinical assessment. Timepoint: 1.Mean Crestal bone level measurements to be assessed at 1 year with standardized radiographs. 2.Implant survival rates to be assessed at 1 year with radiographic and clinical assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess Pain, Discomfort, Swelling and Interference with daily activities using 10cm Visual Analogue Scale at 1 week post operatively.Timepoint: one week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PRIYANKAB

SRM DENTAL COLLEGE

akashpsg@gmail.com9840870990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026