Comparing egg shell derived calcium phosphate cement with bone graft (synthetic hydroxyapatite) in bone defects

A Clinical and Radiographic evaluation of Egg Shell derived Calcium Phosphate Cement over Synthetic Hydroxyapatite in Periodontal Osseous Defects: A Randomized Controlled Split Mouth Trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/09/021017

Enrollment

Registered

2019-09-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: SYNTHETIC HYDROXYAPATITE: It is synthetically derived hydroxyapatite which fills bone defect Control Intervention1: EGG SHELL DERIVED CALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENT: EGG SHELL DERIVED TETRA C

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Systemically healthy patients. Patients having maxillary & mandibular osseous defects with probing depth >= 5 mm and clinical attachment loss of >=5 mm from the cementoenamel junction. Patients with radiographic osseous defects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemically compromised patients and those on medications. Pregnant women and lactating mother. Patients allergic to drugs. Smokers. Bruxism.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
INCREASE IN BONE LEVEL AFTER PLACEMENT OF EGG SHELL DERIVED CALCIUM PHOSPHATE CEMENTTimepoint: BASE LINE, 1 MONTH, 3 MONTHS AND 6 MONTHS	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
DECREASE IN THE POCKET PROBING DEPTHTimepoint: BASE LINE, 1 MONTH, 3 MONTHS AND 6 MONTHS	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr S VIDYA SAGAR

Kamineni Institute of dental scienes

drsagarperio@gmail.com9989117747

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026