FindTrial
Sign In

comparison between 3D plates vs miniplate fixation in low condylar fractures

Efficacy of fixation of low condylar fractures (condylar neck/head fracture) using trapezoidal 3D plate vs. conventional miniplate osteosynthesis â?? a prospective observational study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/08/020526
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-08-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Asmita Unadkat
Lead Sponsor
Asmita Unadkat
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with low condylar (condylar base/neck) fracture of mandible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Condylar head fracture (intracapsular) Paediatric patients Patients unfit for surgery Patient who could not be followed up post operatively for minimum 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To conclude efficacy of fixation between Trepezoidal plate and miniplate in mandibular low- Condylar (condylar base/neck) fractures.Timepoint: 3rd post-operative day After 1 week After 6 weeks After 3 months After 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To conclude efficacy of fixation between Trepezoidal plate and miniplate in mandibular low- Condylar (condylar base/neck) fractures.Timepoint: 3rd post-operative day After 1 week After 6 weeks After 3 months After 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Asmita Unadkat

Manipal college of dental sciences

sunilmaxfac@gmail.com9845308590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026