Skip to content

Comparison of intubating devices(iSCOPE3 videolaryngoscope and Airtraq)

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN ISCOPE 3 VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND AIRTRAQ, IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRACHEAL INTUBATION - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/08/020514
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-08-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 3: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: iSCOPE 3 videolaryngoscope: Videolaryngoscope used for oral intubation for period of 1yr Control Intervention1: Airtraq: It is an intubating device Control Intervention2: Airtraq: Optic

Sponsors

Department of anaesthesiology amd critical care JNMCH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade 1 and 2 Age- 20 to 50 years Gender- female and male BMI MMP Class - all classes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Decreased inter-incisor distance Short thyromental distance Any facial anomaly Fixed facial deformity Patient at risk of pulmonary aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation timeTimepoint: 10 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of successful intubation Ease of tracheal intubation POGO scoring Cormack lehane grading Hemodynamic responses after laryngoscopy Complications(if any) Timepoint: 10 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSania parveen

Jawaharlal nehru medical college, AMU, Aligarh

sma99@rediffmail.com9897454739

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026