FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Comparison of Superior Vena Cava & Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Changes by Echocardiography in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/07/020480
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-07-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I958- Other hypotension

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

DR RAM MANOHAR LOHIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with suspected diagnosis of hypovolemic & septic shock with mechanical ventilator support admitted in ICU.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patientâ??s legal guardianâ??s refusal to give consent. 2. Patients with neurogenic, cardiogenic shock & obstructive shock. 3.Pregnancy 4.Amputation or severe limb ischemia 5.Contraindication to transoesophageal echocardiography(TEE): -Esophageal stricture, esophageal perforation, large diaphragmatic hernia, atlantoaxial disease, gastrointestinal bleeding etc 7. Contraindication to passive leg raise(PLR) manoeuvre: -Elevated intracranial pressure, tamponade, acute aortic dissection etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of changes in superior vena cava and inferior vena cava diameter after passive leg raiseTimepoint: 1 minute after passive leg raise—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in hemodynamic variables in response to passive leg raise.Timepoint: after passive leg raise—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR VISHAL UPADHYAY

DR RAM MANOHAR LOHIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

drdm58@gmail.com05226692063

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026