Skip to content

COMPARISON OF INSERTION CHARACTERISTICS OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY USING ROTATION TECHNIQUES VS STANDARD TECHIQUE IN ADULTS

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INSERTION CHARACTERISTICS OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY PROSEAL USING ROTATION TECHNIQUES VS STANDARD TECHNIQUE IN ADULT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/07/020415
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-07-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 90° rotational technique: Holding the LMA ProSeal, its entire cuff will be placed into the patientâ??s mouth via the midline approach without finger insertion and

Sponsors

Vardhman Mahavir Medical college and Safdarjung Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients should be fulfilling American Society of anaesthesiologists grade 1 or grade 2 scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation using LMA Proseal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anticipated difficult airway examples: mouth opening 30 Kg/m2, History of systemic and metabolic disorders. Recent upper respiratory tract infection, sore throat, history of asthma;Risk of regurgitation and aspiration, pregnancy, cervical spine disease,head and neck surgeries.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
first attempt insertion success rate of LMA ProSealTimepoint: first attempt insertion success rate of LMA ProSeal

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adverse effectsTimepoint: At 1 hour post-operatively and next post-operative morning.;Hemodynamic parametersTimepoint: 1,3 and 5 minutes

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anita Seth

Vardhman Mahavir Medical college and Safdarjung Hospital

dranitaseth@hotmail.com9811340606

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026