Skip to content

Comparison between Efficacy of two types of treatment for Frozen Shoulder Pain

Comparative Evaluation Between Steroid Vs Combined Steroid With Pulsed Radiofrequency In Suprascapular Nerve Intervention For Frozen Shoulder Pain: A Randomised Control Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/07/020233
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M138- Other specified arthritis

Interventions

Intervention1: Injection triamcinolone 40mg and pulsed radiofrequency in Suprascapular nerve: Injection triamcinolone 40mg and combined injection triamcinolone 40mg with pulsed radiofrequency in Supra

Sponsors

Dr Ram Manohar Lohia institute of medical sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with shoulder pain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age 80 years, COPD patients, pregnant females, patients with coagulopathic diseases, patients allergic to drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effectiveness of pain relief by suprascapularnerve intervention by injection triamcilonolone vs combined Steroid with pulsed Radiofrequency in patients with frozen shoulder painTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare improvement in range of motion of shoulder joint by Suprascapular nerve intervention by Steroid vs combined Steroid with pulsed radiofrequencyTimepoint: 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deepti sharma

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow

neuromanu@yahoo.com8176007201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026