Comparison of a water resistant material and a normal material in terms of lastingness to prevent tooth decay.

Comparison of retention of a moisture tolerant pit and fissure sealant with resin based conventional pit and fissure sealant.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/07/020163

Enrollment

Registered

2019-07-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Moisture Tolerant Pit and Fissure sealant : Pulpdent Embrace Wetbond Pit and Fissure Sealant Control Intervention1: Conventional Pit and Fissure Sealant: 3M Clinpro Pit and Fissure Seal

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: High dental caries risk prone children

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with one molar on either side which is grossly carious or restored. Uncooperative children/children not willing to participate Molar teeth with antagonist tooth not present or extracted Children with dental fluorosis Children with habits like bruxism Children with rampant caries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Retention rate of the sealantsTimepoint: 3, 6 and 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NONETimepoint: NONE	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Keerthy S

The Oxford Dental College

madhusudhan6009@gmail.com9886298680

Outcome results