COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF KEY HOLE SURGERIES FOR RENAL STONES

COMPARATIVE OUT COMES OF CONVENTIONAL PCNL AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE PCNL IN TREATMENT OF KIDNEY STONES

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/07/020087

Enrollment

Registered

2019-07-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N20- Calculus of kidney and ureter

Interventions

Intervention1: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL): In one group perform mini PCNL and another group perform Conventional PCNL and compare both groups Control Intervention1: MINI PCNL: IN MINI PCNL TRA

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ALL PATIENTS WITH RENAL CALCULUS WHO PLANNED FOR PCNL AT THIS TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. PATIENTS WITH STONE IN THE SINGLE FUNCTIONING KIDNEY 2. PATENTS WITH PAST HISTORY OF SURGERY FOR RENAL STONES 3. PATIENT WITH DERANGED RENAL PARAMETERS

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of 1. Stone clearance rateTimepoint: 18 MONTHS	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of 1.complication rate between the two groupsTimepoint: 18 MONTHS	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRAJESH K P

ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE

majoramitagrawal@gmail.com9971664222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026