FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Evaluation Of The Rate Of Tooth Movement with two different surgical modalities

Comparative Evaluation Of The Rate Of Canine Retraction Following Piezocision And Micro-Osteoperforation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/06/019829
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-06-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro-osteoperforation: Cortical bone is punctured with miniscrews without raising soft tissue flap. Control Intervention1: Piezocision: Cortical bone is cut using piezotome after makin

Sponsors

Director General Armed Forces Medical Services
Lead Sponsor
Commandant Army Dental Centre R and R
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Class II Div 1 malocclusion requiring first premolar extraction and bilateral maxillary canine retraction. Patient with good oral hygiene with gingival sulcus depths not exceeding 3mm. No previous history of orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of recent periodontal therapy. Congenital disorders, syndromes, CLP. Patients on systemic corticosteroids and/or anti-inflammatory drugs. Systemic diseases â?? congenital heart disease, DM, osteoporosis, hyper parathyroid, vit D deficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of Maxillary Canine retractionTimepoint: 3 times—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the over all treatment duration and comfort of patientsTimepoint: 3 times—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Adarsh Chauhan

Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi

sanjaylondhe14@gmail.com9756909767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026