Skip to content

A study to compare two airway devices in patients with fixed neck.

A study to compare Air Q with Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway as intubation conduit in patients with simulated fixed cervical spine

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/06/019782
Enrollment
88
Registered
2019-06-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K605- Anorectal fistula Health Condition 2: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis Health Condition 3: K36- Other appendicitis Health Condition 4: K403- Unilateral inguinal hernia, with obstruction, without gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: Air Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway: A two piece semi rigid cervical collar of appropriate size will be placed around the neck of the patient . All the routine vital monitors will be atta

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patient 18 to 60 years of age of either sex , ASA physical status I or II , scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring intubation .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients at risk of gastric content aspiration , anticipated difficult airway, interincisor gap 30, poor lung compliance and abnormal oropharyngeal anatomy .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Success rate of intubation. 2. Number of attempts. 3. Time taken for insertion of device and intubation. 4. Ventilation through device. 5. Fibre optic grading . 6. Haemodynamic parameters. 7. Adverse effects .Timepoint: The following will be assessed for both Air Q and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway . Data will be compiled and appropriate statistical test will be used to analyse the results

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Success rate of intubation. 2. Number of attempts. 3. Time taken for insertion of device and intubation. 4. Ventilation through device. 5. Fibre optic grading . 6. Haemodynamic parameters. 7. Adverse effects .Timepoint: The following will be assessed for both Air Q and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway. Data will be compiled and appropriate statistical test will be used to analyse the results

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jasmine Basumatary

Pt. B. D. Sharma , PGIMS , Rohtak

j.basumatary50@gmail.com7896567209

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026