Skip to content

Study for reduction of Eye Pressure

A PROSPECTIVE, OPEN, MULTICENTRE CLINICAL TRIAL ANALYSING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF MINIJECT (MINI SO627) IN PATIENTS WITH OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA UNCONTROLLED BY TOPICAL HYPOTENSIVE MEDICATIONS USING A SINGLE OPERATOR DELIVERY TOOL - ISM08

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/06/019564
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H40-H42- Glaucoma

Interventions

Intervention1: MINI SO627: Glaucoma Drainage Device Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention2: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

iSTAR Medical SA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Males or females, 18 years of age or older. 2. Diagnosis of primary or secondary open angle glaucoma during screening/baseline visit or earlier. 3. Grade 3 (open, 20-35 degrees) or grade 4 (wide open, 35-45 degrees) according to Shaffer Angle Grading System. 4. Glaucoma not adequately controlled by one to four different topical hypotensive medication(s), given each for at least one month, as confirmed by 21mmHg 5. Patients must be willing and able to return for scheduled study-related examinations. 6. Patients must provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Grade 2 (narrow, 20 degrees), grade 1 (extremely narrow, less or equal to 10 degrees) and grade 0 (closed or slit) according to Shaffer Angle Grading System in the study eye. 2. Neovascular glaucoma in the study eye. 3. Corneal opacity or iridocorneal angle not visible through gonioprism in the study eye, preventing correct placement of the implant in the stud eye. 4. Prior glaucoma surgery in the study eye. Patient treated with argon laser trabeculoplasty or selective laser trabeculoplasty in the study eye are eligible if treatment was performed � 90 days before baseline visit in the study eye. 5. Visual field defect in the 10-degree central field in the study eye. 6. Any eye surgery that was performed � 90 days before baseline visit in the study eye. 7. Anticipated need for ocular surgery or retinal laser procedure in the study eye 12 months following surgery in the study eye. 8. Anterior chamber anatomic configuration of high risk for development of angle closure glaucoma in the study eye. 9. Pre-existing ocular or systemic pathology that, in the opinion of the physician, is likely to cause postoperative complications following implantation of the device in the study eye. 10. Clinically significant corneal disease (e.g., corneal dystrophy) in the study eye. 11. Evidence of crystalline lens subluxation or luxation in the study eye. 12. Evidence of vitreous loss in the anterior chamber in the study eye. 13. Clinically significant intra-ocular inflammation or infection, presence of ocular disease such as uveitis, ocular infection, severe dry eye, severe blepharitis, active proliferative/inflammatory retinopathy in the study eye. 14. Presence of silicone oil in the study eye. 15. Patients treated with systemic acetazolamide within 3 days before screening/baseline visit. 16. Patient with poor vision score: +1.0 in non-study eye, unless there is an expected benefit for the study eye in the opinion of the investigator. 17. Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device within the past 3 months and planned participation to any other study during the present study. 18. Only for women of childbearing potential: positive blood pregnancy test at baseline visit. 19. Individuals under tutorship or trusteeship.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The reduction in medicated mean diurnal IOP at 6 months follow-up compared to medicated diurnal IOP at baseline visit.Timepoint: The reduction in medicated mean diurnal IOP at 6 months follow-up compared to medicated diurnal IOP at baseline visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To test the absolute and relative (in%) reduction in medicated diurnal IOP between baseline visit and medicated diurnal IOP at 12- and 24 months after surgery. To assess the ââ?¬Ë?complete successââ?¬â?¢ rate at 12 and at 24 months after surgery. To assess the ââ?¬Ë?qualified successââ?¬â?¢ rate at 12 and 24 months after surgery.Timepoint: Day 1, Week 1, Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

Countries

Colombia, India, Panama

Contacts

Public ContactNaresh Kumar Pagidimarry

Maxivision Super Speciality Eye Hospital

kasuprasadreddy@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026