FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two different devices at the beginning of anaesthesia in paediatric population.

Comparative evaluation of Airtraq optical laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in the paediatric population.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/06/019556
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-06-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal intubation in paediatric population with macintosh or airtraq optical laryngoscope.: After adequate NPO and premedication child will be taken in operation theatre.After att

Sponsors

Maulana Azad Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children of 2 to 8 yrs of age belonging to ASA grade I & II undergoing elective suregery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intrubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mouth opening Modified Mallampati class III & IV Predicted difficult airway ( anatomical deformity of head and neck, fracture of maxillofacial region, tumors of oral cavity)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) scoreTimepoint: At the time of intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Time to intubate 2.Hemodynamic response (Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure) 3.Complications ( blood staining on device/endotracheal tub, hoarseness of voice at recovery and 24hrs post operatively)Timepoint: At the time of intubation At 2min intervals for next 10 minutes. 24hrs postoperatively—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sonia Wadhawan

Maulana Azad Medical College

soniawadhawan@hotmail.com9968604218

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026