FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Kingvision & Truview videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscope

Comparative evaluation of Kingvision videolaryngoscope Truview videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019391
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-05-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: king vision videolaryngoscope: video assisted laryngoscope to be used for a period of 1 year Intervention2: truview video laryngoscope: video assisted laryngoscope to be used for a peri

Sponsors

Dr Humaira Bashir
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients of either sex 2. Age 20-70 3. ASA grade 1 and II 4. MPG 1, 2, 3, 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient refusal 2.Age 70 years 3.ASA III and IV 4.Patients with risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents (e.g. pregnancy, diabetes) 5.Patients with history of uncontrolled hypertension 6.Patients with history of cardiovascular disorder 7.Patients with raised intracranial pressure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease in the time to intubation by using the king vision and truview video laryngoscopeTimepoint: 1 year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Blunted hemodynamic response post intubationTimepoint: 1 year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sunana Gupta

ASCOMS hospital

sunaynaarnav@yahoo.com9419160705

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026