FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Mulligan verses conventional Neurodynamic technique in cervical radiculopathy

A Comparative Study of Mulligan Mobilization Versus Conventional Neurodynamic Mobilization on Pain Disability & Cervical ROM in Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019382
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-05-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M501- Cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Mulligan Neurodynamic Mobilization: The glides will be given for three repetitions , three sets for 5 days. To progress the treatment at subsequent sessions, the number of repetitions c

Sponsors

Amita Aggarwal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Unilateral radiating pain from neck to upper limb with atleast one ULTT positive 2 Dermatomal involvement of the affected nerve root. 3 Clinically diagnosed & referred by an orthopaedic surgeon

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Recent history of trauma, fall or injury to cervical region 2 Bilateral upper extremity radicular symptoms 3 UMN signs like gait changes, fine motor changes & hyperreflexia 4 Myelopathies 5 Severe Osteoporosis 6 Active infection 7 Hypermobile joints 8 Vertigo 9 Dizziness 10 Vertebral Basilar artery Insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Patient Specific Functional Scale(PSFS) Cervical ROM Timepoint: On first day and fifth day—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRuvitte Gomes

Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy

amita15pgi@gmail.com7986972513

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026