FindTrial
Sign In

To compare abilities of two infection scores in predicting death, icu transfer, organ failure in patients with suspected surgical infection.

Diagnostic accuracy of qSOFA vs. SIRS in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to surgical emergency

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019309
Enrollment
270
Registered
2019-05-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 2: L00-L08- Infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Case records of all patients â??admitted In surgical emergency >18 years with suspected sepsis Suspected sepsis is defined as â??â??1.Patients started on antibiotics â??â??2.Patients whose blood, pus, tissue bit have been sent for culture â??â??â??and sensitivity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: â??1.Any patient who is referred with documented organ failure at admission. 2.â??Incomplete data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of qSOFA vs. SIRS in predicting organ failure as defined by mSOFA (Modified Sequential Organ Failure assessment) , in- hospital mortality and ICU stay in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to surgical emergencyTimepoint: 0 hrs, 48-72hrs—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not applicableTimepoint: Not applicable—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr N Rajkumar

Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research

raj.jipmer@gmail.com9443292979

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026