A clinical research to compare the remineralising effects of two commercially available pastes.

Comparative evaluation of remineralization efficacy Nanohydroxyapatite and Bioactive glass on demineralized enamel â?? An in situ study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/05/019306

Enrollment

Registered

2019-05-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nanohydroxyapatite paste: A commercially available Paste containing nano sized hydroxyapatite applied on the surface of enamel slab twice daily. Duration: 3 minutes for each application

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants with good oral hygiene, Participants with a salivary pH ranging between 6.8 â?? 7.2, Participants with salivary flow above 1.0ml/min Presence of atleast 22 natural teeth with no caries activity or periodontal disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants with poor oral hygiene Participants with very high caries activity Participants with less than 22 teeth Participants on antimicrobial or any other treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Vickerâ??s microhardness valuesTimepoint: 7 days after remineralization	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NATimepoint: NA	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr A Yogha Padhma

Adhiparasakthi Dental College

srinistatsolutions@gmail.com9840479056

Outcome results