COMPARISON OF ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UNILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

COMPARISON OF ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF CONTINUOUS ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK VERSUS SINGLE SHOT ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCK USING ROPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING UNILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/05/019215

Enrollment

Registered

2019-05-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Continuous adductor canal block group: Local infiltrative analgesia will be given at closure. It will consist of 75 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine+ 0.2 mg adrenaline+ 30 mg ketorolac. Ultraso

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients of either sex fulfilling ASA Physical status Grade 1 and 2, undergoing elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty are eligible for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare analgesic efficacy : 1. Assessment of postoperative pain. 2. Time to first rescue analgesia 3. Total amount of analgesia required.Timepoint: Assessment of postoperative pain at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours using visual analog scale.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Straight leg raise test 2. Maximum knee ExtensionTimepoint: On the day of surgery and postoperative day 1	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR Ashish Choudhary

VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital

ameetaas@yahoo.com9811201585

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026