Skip to content

To compare lingual bonded retainer post orthodontically

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of four different lingually bonded retainers.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019136
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-05-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: to evaluate the clinical efficacy of four different types of lingually bonded retainers: the study would be the comparison of four different types of bonded retainers they are coaxial w

Sponsors

maharabam gyanada
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. An absence of active periodontal and gingival conditions. 2. Patient who consented to be a part of the study. 3. Patients who had completed fixed orthodontic treatment and were debonded. 4. Patients who were compliant enough for regular follow up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: active periodontal and gingival condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to check the periodontal status i.e plaque index, gingival index and probing depth at baseline (BL), 3months, 6months and 9monthsTimepoint: at every 3months interval

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy of wiresTimepoint: evaluate on every three months interval

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactmaharabam gyanada

subharti dental college

drstuti.ortho@gmail.com8449333364

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026