Skip to content

Comparison of the clinical performance of I gel and Ambu Aura Gain supra glottic airway devices in paediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

Comparison of the clinical performance of I-gel and Ambu Aura Gain -supra-glottic airway devices in paediatric patients under controlled ventilation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019126
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-05-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K402- Bilateral inguinal hernia, withoutobstruction or gangrene Health Condition 3: L029- Cutaneous abscess, furuncle and carbuncle, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Insertion of I-gel: ï?­ The device insertion technique will be based on anufacturerâ??s recommendation. We will use â??finger techniqueâ?? for all the insertions. Ventilator parameters

Sponsors

Ashka V Surve
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients age group 3-10 years 2.Either gender 3.Weight 10-35 kg 4.ASA physical status I/II 5.Patients admitted in SSGH and posted for 6.Elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia ( abdominal surgeries, upper limb surgeries, lower limb surgeries, head and neck surgeries etc. )

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient with risk factors of difficult airway (mouth opening of 2.Patients with recent upper respiratory tract infection. 3.Patient with any known pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. 4.Patient with any conditions that increase the risk of gastro esophageal regurgitation. 5.Parents or guardian not willing for participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The oropharyngeal seal pressure of I-gel is higher than Ambu Aura Gain in their individual studies. Whereas insertion of Ambu aura gain is faster than I-Gel.Timepoint: at 5 minute after insertion of the device, oropharyngeal leak pressure will be noted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes are haemodynamic and respiratory parameters.Timepoint: These secondary outcomes are observed throughout the duration of surgery.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAshka V Surve

Government Medical College and SSG Hospital Vadodara

mgpatel111@yahoo.com9825453024

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026