FindTrial
Sign In

To compare new perimeter Elisars algorithm called Zest with SITA standard algorithm

Comparison of the New Elisar Zest Algorithm with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019106
Enrollment
140
Registered
2019-05-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H409- Unspecified glaucoma

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NA: NA

Sponsors

Dr Amar Agarwal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: 1.The best corrected visual acuity should be 6/6 for age 55 years. 2.Cup disc ratio less than 0.5 (intraocular difference of 0.2 mm) 3.IOP

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: Fixation losses, false positive and false negative > 20% will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To establish a correlation between Elisar and Humphrey visual field analyzer. If both the devices correlate well, Elisar can be used in place of Humphrey due its portable nature.Timepoint: 30 days—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glaucoma can be picked up at the early stage due to its affordability and portable nature.Timepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMaheswari Srinivasan

Dr. Agarwals eye hospitals

maheswari.srinivasan@dragarwal.com09841661134

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026