Skip to content

Comparison of tooth movement between techniques that use braces fixed in front surface of teeth and braces fixed on the back surface of teeth

Three dimensional evaluation of Labial & Lingual orthodontic technique for en masse maxillary anterior teeth retraction using microimplant-lever arm mechanics - A Comparative clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019072
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-05-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Lingual Orthodontic technique: Enmasse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with microimplant-lever arm mechanics in customised Lingual orthodontic technique. Force delivery :250gm ca

Sponsors

DrAbirami R
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Malocclusion diagnosis : Angleâ??s Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion/Class II division 1; Treatment plan : extraction of maxillary first premolars required with maximum anchorage for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth. Normal growth pattern No active periodontal lesions Not under chronic medication like NSAIDs, steroids, bisphosphonates, etc., that alter bone metabolism. No Craniofacial anomalies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: H/O Systemic illness. H/O Previous orthodontic treatment Missing teeth except for third molars Presence of ankylosed teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the position of maxillary anteriors in sagittal plane (Y-axis) between labial and lingual orthodontic technique with en-masse retraction.Timepoint: Pre retraction, Post-retraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the position of maxillary anteriors in vertical (Z-axis) & transverse plane (X-axis) between labial and lingual orthodontic technique with en-masse retraction. To evaluate and compare rate of tooth movement & treatment duration between labial and lingual orthodontic technique with en-masse retraction.Timepoint: Pre-retraction, Post-retraction

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abirami R

S.C.B Dental College & Hospital

orthosuryakantadas@gmail.com9861099237

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026