TO COMPARE THE ANATOMICAL SURFACE LANDMARK APPROACH AND ULTRASOUND GUIDED APPROACH FOR INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CATHETERISATION IN ADULT PATIENTS

ANATOMICAL SURFACE LANDMARK APPROACH VERSUS ULTRASOUND GUIDED APPROACH FOR INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CATHETERISATION IN ADULT PATIENTS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/05/019053

Enrollment

Registered

2019-05-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CATHETERISATION: INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CATHETERISATION BY USING SURFACE ANATOMICAL LANDMARK TECHNIQUE VERSUS ULTRASOUND GUIDED TECHNIQUE. Control Intervention1: SU

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i. Adult patients aged between 20 and 70 years. ii. Anaesthetized patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Patient refusal for the procedure. ii. Patient with bleeding disorder and on anticoagulant treatment. iii. Abnormal neck anatomy. iv. Known vascular abnormality. v. Emphysematous patients. vi. Local infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To Compare the success rate,number of attempts,time taken and complications of internal jugular vein cannulation by using surface anatomical landmark technique versus ultrasound guided technique. Timepoint: 1.PRE-OPERATIVE 2.INTRA-OPERATIVE 3.POST-OPERATIVE	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactATHIRA RAMESH

GGS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

drsarvjeetk@gmail.com9915680508

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026