FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparison between laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia by using two different mesh.

Prospective comparative study of laproscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia with light weight polypropylene mesh v/s 3D anatomically shaped large pore polypropylene mesh.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/05/019006
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-05-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K40- Inguinal hernia

Interventions

Intervention1: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia with 3D anatomically shaped large pore polypropylen

Sponsors

Department of Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the patients of age between 20 to 80 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient having history of Preperitoneal surgery done. Patient who are unfit for general anestheisa.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To achieve laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with least post operative pain and complications . Time taken for mesh fixation. Length of hospital stay .Timepoint: 3 days 1 week 2 week 1 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for discharge from the hospital. Least chances of recurrence.Timepoint: 1 week 2 week 1 month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jekee B Patel

GMC ,Bhavnagar.

shah.samir@rediffmail.com9427215253

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026