Comparing I-gel versus LMA Proseal regarding airway management in controlled hypertensive patients.

Comparative assessment of I-gel and LMA Proseal for airway management in controlled hypertensive patients posted for short surgical procedures.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/05/018929

Enrollment

Registered

2019-05-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: I-gel: Supra-glottic airway device (Second generation) Oral route Duration: less than 45mins Control Intervention1: LMA Proseal: Supra-glottic airway device (Second generation) Oral rou

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.MPG I&II 2.Mouth opening >2.5cm 3.Controlled hypertensives (BP<=140/90mm of Hg with medication).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Restricted mouth opening ( 2.Risks of aspiration( GERD, hiatus hernia) 3.Oropharyngeal pathology, cervical spine fracture or instability 4.History of known or anticipated difficult airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Insertion time (in secs)Timepoint: Time recorded from which the predetermined sized lubricated SAD was picked up to the time it was correctly placed with first effective end-tidal capnography waveform was seen	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Ease of insertionTimepoint: Easy/Difficult;Fibreoptic assessment of airway tube on a four point scaleTimepoint: Brimacombe scoreï? 4:only vocal cords are visible, 3: cords and posterior epiglottis visible, 2: cords and anterior epiglottis visible, 1: vocal cords not seen;Hemodynamic responsesTimepoint: MAP/HR;Number of attempts for insertion Timepoint: 1/2/failed;Oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: cm of H2O;Post-operative complicationsTimepoint: Airway trauma Sore throat	—

Measure

Time frame

Ease of insertionTimepoint: Easy/Difficult;Fibreoptic assessment of airway tube on a four point scaleTimepoint: Brimacombe scoreï? 4:only vocal cords are visible, 3: cords and posterior epiglottis visible, 2: cords and anterior epiglottis visible, 1: vocal cords not seen;Hemodynamic responsesTimepoint: MAP/HR;Number of attempts for insertion Timepoint: 1/2/failed;Oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: cm of H2O;Post-operative complicationsTimepoint: Airway trauma Sore throat

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Tanmay Sarkar

North Bengal Medical College

dr.sarkar08@gmail.com08016939433

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026