Skip to content

Comparing the efficiency of two new scoring systems to evaluate the uterine causes of abnormal bleeding and its prognosis

Comparison of DEERS (Diseases of endometrium evaluation and risk scoring system) with modified DEERS scoring system for prognostication of abnormal uterine bleeding, a case control study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018863
Enrollment
243
Registered
2019-04-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N926- Irregular menstruation, unspecified

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)women with abnormal uterine bleeding who are scheduled to undergo endometrial curettage 2)women with abnormal uterine bleeding who are scheduled to undergo hysterectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)women on hormonal replacement therapy 2)women with coagulation disorders 3)women with intrauterine devices 4)women not willing to be a part of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy of modified DEERS scoring system in the prognostication of endometrial causes of abnormal uterine bleedingTimepoint: 17-09-2020

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparing the efficacy of DEERS and modified DEERS scoring system in prognostication endometrial causes of abnormal uterine bleedingTimepoint: 2 years

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nehal Meghna Machado

Kasturba Medical college,Manipal

deekshiiiobg@gmail.com9241216016

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026