Skip to content

COMPARING TWO TYPES OF TOOTHBRUSH ON SPINAL CORD INJURY PATIENTS

EFFICACY OF MODIFIED MANUAL TOOTH BRUSH AND POWERED TOOTH BRUSH ON PLAQUE AND GINGIVITIS - A CLINICAL TRIAL ON SPINAL CORD INJURY PATIENTS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018850
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-04-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S142- Injury of nerve root of cervical spine

Interventions

Intervention1: MODIFIED MANUAL TOOTH BRUSH , ORAL-B CROSS ACTION POWERED TOOTH BRUSH: Individual modification done to manual toothbrush Control Intervention1: MODIFIED MANUAL TOOTH BRUSH , ORAL-B CROS

Sponsors

KARTHIKAYAN
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)complete upper limb paralysis 2)Under treatment for minimum 1 year period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Lower limb paralysis (Incomplete injury)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Plaque and gingivitis in spinal injury patientsTimepoint: cross over design - 6 weeks and 4 weeks washout period ,and then 6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ATTITUDE AND KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ORAL HEALTH PRACTICESTimepoint: cross over design - 6 weeks and 4 weeks washout period ,and then 6 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRKARTHIKAYAN

Ragas Dental College And Hospital

phdragas@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026