A research to evaluate and compare two airway management devices (Baska airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway)in patients undergoing general surgery.

Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between self pressurizing (Baska airway) and non-self pressurizing (Proseal laryngeal mask airway) supraglottic airways in adult patients scheduled for surgeries during general anaesthesia.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/04/018843

Enrollment

Registered

2019-04-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Proseal laryngeal mask airway: Will be used to maintain the patency of airway during general anaesthesia. The device will only be inserted after induction of anaesthesia. Control Interv

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The following patients would be included for the study: 1. Age group between 18 to 60 years 2. American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II 3. Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia (Duration of surgery 2 Â±0.5 hrs)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The following patients would not be included for the study: 1. Patients with anticipated difficult airway (ADS >8). 2. Patients with upper respiratory tract infection 3. Patients with increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric content. 4. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg.m2 5. Patients with history of radiotherapy to the neck involving the hypopharynx. 6. Patients undergoing surgeries involving neck and oral cavity. 7. Pregnant patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare respiratory indexes in both Baska airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway.Timepoint: Immediatly after the placement of device then every 5 mins till 15 mins and then at 30 mins after the placement of device.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, hemodynamic data and postoperative complications in two groups.Timepoint: 1. Ease of insertion of device, ease of use of gastric tube placement and fiberoptic placement will be observed immediatly after the placement of device. 2. Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters every 5 mins till 15 mins and then at 30 mins after the placement of device.	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, hemodynamic data and postoperative complications in two groups.Timepoint: 1. Ease of insertion of device, ease of use of gastric tube placement and fiberoptic placement will be observed immediatly after the placement of device. 2. Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters every 5 mins till 15 mins and then at 30 mins after the placement of device.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Maninder kaur

Government medical college and hospital , Chandigarh

manpreetdawar@gmail.com9646121503

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026