FindTrial
Sign In

A comparision in making artificial airway for breathing by two methods in intensive care unit

Comparison of percutaneous tracheostomy methods in ICU patients; Conventional anatomical landmarks Vs Ultrasonography guidance methods.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018805
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-04-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Tracheostomy: Percutaneous tracheostomy in ICU patients Control Intervention1: Percutaneous tracheostomy methods: Conventional anatomical landmark method Vs Ultrasonography guidance met

Sponsors

Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences Patna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients needed prolong ventilation Upper Airway foreign body that cannot be dislodged with Heimlich and basic life support manoeuvres Neck trauma resulting in severe injury to the thyroid or cricoid cartilages ,hyoid bone or great vessels

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients aged 80 years Ventilator support Any neck mass or swelling in neck Patients with abnormal or poorly palpable midline neck anatomy. Patients needed isolation like tuberculosis, Hepatitis-B, Hepatitis-C and HIV-I & II . Patients with coagulopathy. Paediatric Patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare percutaneous tracheostomy methods in ICU patients: Conventional anatomical landmarks method and ultrasonography guidance method. Timepoint: From intervention to upto ICU stay—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between the studied groups according to sex. Comparison between the studied group according to neck length (cm). Comparison between the studied group according to the duration of procedure (min). Comparison between the studied groups according to the number of the trials. Comparison between the studied groups according to the immediate complication. Comparison between the studied groups according to the late complication.Timepoint: Not applicable—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sanjeev Kumar

Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences

sanjeev_pranay71@hotmail.com9473191829

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026