FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing two types of video assisted devices for securing airway

Comparision of standard and channeled blade of Kingvision viedo laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation -A randomized control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018771
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-04-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K358- Other and unspecified acute appendicitis

Interventions

Intervention1: using two different video laryngoscopes for oro trachial intubation: comparing channelled and standered blades for intubation measuring speed and ease Control Intervention1: king vision

Sponsors

S N Medical College and HSK Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2 physical status posted for surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3 and 4 physical status emergency cases full stomach patients anticipated difficult airway patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine difference in intubation time of channelled and nonchanelled blade of kingvision videolaryngoscope.Timepoint: Time between tip of blade passes incisor teeth and appearance of first capnography curve—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
number of attempts of insertion compare in the change in the parameters like heart rate blood pressure saturationTimepoint: within 5 minutes of device insertion—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Srinivas Kurahatti

S N Medical College Bagalkot

rameshkoppaldr@gmail.com9845504515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026