Skip to content

Comparison of airway assessment using Ultrasonography versus other conventional methods.

Comparison of Sonographic Assessment of Tongue Thickness and Condylar Mobility with Traditional Airway Assessment Score for Prediction of Difficult Intubation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018660
Enrollment
384
Registered
2019-04-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Swami Rama Himalayan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 to 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with maxillofacial trauma or malformation 2. Patients with maxillofacial, oral, or tongue cancer. 3. Laryngeal and tracheal patients with neck tumor compressions. 4. Patients who need awake intubation. 5. Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Results of Laryngoscopy evaluated as Cormack-Lehane level.Timepoint: During Induction at the time of Intubation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To identify the ease of intubationTimepoint: At the time of Intubation.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Veena Asthana

Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences

veenaasthana@srhu.edu.in9719529195

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026