FindTrial
Sign In

Analgesic efficacy of Pre-Emptive USG guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block vs Femoral nerve block vs articular branch block while positioning the patient during neuraxial anaesthesia for unilateral hip fracture surgery

A Comparative Study of analgesic efficacy of Pre-Emptive USG guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block vs Femoral nerve block vs articular branch block while positioning the patient during neuraxial anaesthesia for unilateral hip fracture surgery- A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018654
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-04-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur Health Condition 2: S39- Other and unspecified injuries ofabdomen, lower back, pelvis and external genitals Health Condition 3: S721- Pertrochanteric fracture Health Condition 4: S722- Subtrochanteric fracture of femur

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Per-Emptive Femoral Nerve block: Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block given to the patient in the Preop holding area before shifting to OT Using 20 cc o

Sponsors

Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital Private Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Unilateral hip fractures like, NOF fracture, IT Fracture, ST fracture, ACETABULAR fracture Patient who already received/ not received on arrival Block for unilateral hip fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient Refusal, Polytrauma Patient, Allergic to LA, Patient with Cognitive dysfunction Age less than 10 yrs or more than 90 yrs Patient with mental illness Bilateral hip fractures Patient not fit for Neuraxial anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Analgesic Efficacy of Pre-Emptive BlockTimepoint: Rest / Dynamic VAS score (0-10) at 0, 5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after giving block or before shifting to OT whichever is earlier—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Active Hip Flexion inside OT after Pre-Emptive BlockTimepoint: 0, 15,30,45,90, more than 90 degrees;Assistants required for patient PositioningTimepoint: 1,2,3,4, more than 4;Opioid consumption for positioning patient for Neuraxial anaesthesia inside OTTimepoint: Yes or No;Pain score inside OT after Pre-Emptive BlockTimepoint: VAS score (0-10) in Supine position VAS Score (0-10) in Sitting Position;Patient AcceptanceTimepoint: Yes or No;Quality of patient positioning for Neuraxial anaesthesia inside OTTimepoint: (0-3) 0- worst, 1- Bad, 2- Good, 3- Best;Time taken for Neuraxial AnaesthesiaTimepoint: Time from supine position inside OT before Neuraxial anaesthesia till Supine position after Neuraxial anaesthesia in minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kartik Sonawane

Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital Private Limited

drkartiksonawane@gmail.com9561840842

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026