FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two methods of radiofrequency treatment in Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

Conventional Radiofrequency vs Pulsed Radiofrequency for the treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia- A comparative Prospective Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/04/018597
Enrollment
22
Registered
2019-04-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G500- Trigeminal neuralgia

Interventions

Intervention1: PRF: Pulsed Radiofrequency ablation of Gasserian Ganglion Control Intervention1: CRF: Conventional radiofrequency of Gasserian ganglion

Sponsors

Dr RMLIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: primary trigeminal neuralgia non responsive to medical management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: refusal to give consent known coagulopathy secondary trigeminal neuralgia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain reliefTimepoint: 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
side effectsTimepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManjari bansal

Dr. RMLIMS

dranurag11@gmail.com8176007285

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026