Skip to content

A study to check the safety and effect of optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with complex lesions in India

Effectiveness and Safety of Optical Coherence Tomography- Guided PCI in Indian Patients with Complex Lesions- A Multicenter, Prospective Registry

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/03/018301
Enrollment
500
Registered
2019-03-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I20-I25- Ischemic heart diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: Not Applicable: Not Applicable Control Intervention1: Not Applicable: Not Applicable

Sponsors

Dr Praveen Chandra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients of either sex aged 95 years > 18 years 2. Patients willing to sign the informed consent form 3. Patients scheduled for a clinically indicated PCI procedure, meeting the below criteria: Medically treated diabetes mellitus, AND/OR (i) Angiographically-detected high risk lesions, with at least one target lesion in the planned target vessel, and meeting the below criteria: Target lesion is the culprit lesion responsible for either NSTEMI, or STEMI >24 hours from the onset of ischemic symptoms. (ii) Long or multiple lesions (defined as intended total stent length in any single target vessel H28 mm) (iii) Bifurcation lesion with side branch H2.5 mm by visual estimation, intended to be treated with planned two-stent strategy (stenting in both the main branch and side branch) (iv) Angiographic severe calcification (defined as angiographically visible calcification on both sides of the vessel wall in the absence of cardiac motion) (v) In-stent restenosis (all patterns, as long as the lesion is at or within the stent margin(s) and has an angiographically visually-assessed DS H70% or DS H50% with non-invasive or invasive evidence of ischemia)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients unwilling to sign informed consent 2.Patients with bypass graft stenoses 3.Patients with renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate 4. Patients with contraindications to dual-antiplatelet therapy up to 1 year 5.Patients with other comorbidities that may limit life expectancy to less than one year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess the minimum stent area 2.To assess the incidence of acute kidney injuryTimepoint: 1.Day 1 2.Day 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the â?? (1) effectiveness of OCT in detecting edge dissections and (2) the number of treated edge dissections Timepoint: Day 1;To assess the luminal gain and stent expansionTimepoint: Day 1;To assess the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) Timepoint: 1, 6 and 12 months;To evaluate the economic considerations of using the OCT technologyTimepoint: 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shariq Anwar

JSS Medical Research India Private Limited

diptendu.santra@jssresearch.com8698065660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026