FindTrial
Sign In

Securing airway through two different supraglottic devices under general anaesthesia

Efficacy of blockbuster LMA in comparison to fastrach LMA as a conduit for blind tracheal intubation: A single blind prospective randomized clinical study - LMA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/03/018250
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-03-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z000- Encounter for general adult medical examination

Interventions

Intervention1: Blind intubation technique through supraglottic airway devices: Comparison of ease of blind tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices which will reduce haemodynamic respon

Sponsors

S Nijalingappa Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA status I-III Mallampatti grade I-III Elective and emergency surgeries performed under general anesthesia BMI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal ASA status IV Mallampatti grade IV Mouth opening Morbid obesity Pregnancy Upper respiratory tract infection Previous airway surgery Patient at risk of regurgitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful blind tracheal intubation through both LMAsTimepoint: 20 SECONDS AFTER LMA INSERTION—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of Lma insertion Time for insertion of LMA and intubation Attempts taken for insertion of LMA and endotracheal tube First pass successful intubation Time for LMA removal Haemodynamic stability ComplicationcTimepoint: 5 MINUTES AFTER INDUCTION—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArchana Endigeri

S Nijalingappa Medical college

archanaendigeri86@gmail.com7406568382

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026