To compare two devices used to maintain oxygenation in patients undergoing anaesthesia

A RCT COMPARING EFFICACY & COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN BASKA MASK AND CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN ANAESTHETIZED SPONTANEOUSLY BREATHING PATIENTS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/03/017981

Enrollment

Registered

2019-03-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N950- Postmenopausal bleeding

Interventions

Intervention1: BASKA mask: BASKA mask is the new generation anaesthetic device used to maintain airway in patients under anaesthesia Control Intervention1: Classical laryngeal amsk: classical larynge

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and ASA 2 MPC 1 and 2 Elective minor procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 3 and ASA 4 Patients with difficult intubation Emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1 Number of attempt taken for insertion of device 2 Time taken to insert the device 3 Measurement of pressure required to elicit leak after inserting the device 4 Ease of intubating with device Timepoint: 1 Number of attempt taken for insertion of device 2 Time taken to insert the device 3 Measurement of pressure required to elicit leak after inserting the device 4 Ease of intubating with device	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1 Changes in pulse rate 2 Changes in blood pressureTimepoint: 1 From the time of insertion of device to next 10 minutes till airway response ends 2 From the time of insertion of device to next 10 minutes till airway response ends	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactP Nandhini

SRM MCH RC

gayathrii.r@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026