Skip to content

Comparison of treatment options for systemic sclerosis

A randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of rituximab, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse and mycophenolate mofetil in systemic sclerosis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017795
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-02-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M349- Systemic sclerosis, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Rituximab: Patients would receive 2 cycles of Rituximab, 6 months apart. Each cycle would include 1 gm Rituximab given twice intravenously 15 days apart (RA protocol â?? Total of 2 gm R

Sponsors

ICMR grant applied
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis as per the 2013 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria, irrespective of their gender, will be included in the study. They may have either diffuse cutaneous or limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. 2. Age >=12 years 3. Patients with the following evidence of pulmonary involvement: % predicted FVC HRCT chest showing involvement of >= 20% of lung area with interstitial lung disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with overlap syndrome. 2. Diagnosis of clinically significant resting pulmonary hypertension requiring treatment diagnosed on echocardiography (defined as tricuspid regurgitation velocity >= 4m/s, eqivalent to estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of 64 mm Hg) while evaluation of the patient during study. 3. Evidence of uncontrolled congestive heart failure, unstable ischemic heart disease, history of pulmonary embolism, or cardiac arrhythmia requiring chronic anticoagulation. 4. FVC 5. Patients who cannot perform spirometry for evaluation of pulmonary function tests despite sufficient counselling about the procedure. 6. More than 50% area of lung showing fibrosis on HRCT chest at baseline. 7. Hematologic abnormality at screening including: • Leukopenia (white blood cells [WBC] • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count • Clinically significant anemia (hemoglobin Participants with an identified and correctable etiology will be eligible if repeat testing shows values greater than the above mentioned cut-off. 8. A diagnosis of chronic liver disease or abnormal baseline liver function tests (total bilirubin or liver enzymes, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase > 2.0 times the upper normal limit). 9. Serum creatinine >2.0mg/dl 10. Pregnancy and/or breast feeding 11. If of child bearing potential (a female participant = 5 years or who has not had a hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy), failure to employ reliable means of contraception. 12. Prior use of oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide, MMF, azathioprine or other putative disease modifying medications in last 3 months (assessed at baseline). 13. Current use, or use within the 30 days prior to their baseline visit, of prednisone (or equivalent) in dose of 40 mg/day. 14. Active infection (Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, tuberculosis, HIV) whose management would be compromised by immunosuppression.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To measure absolute and percentage change in MRSS score from baseline to 2 years. 2. To measure absolute and percentage change in pulmonary function tests (FVC) from baseline to 2 years.Timepoint: 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline at 2 years, in skin histopathology findings.Timepoint: 2 years;Change from baseline in Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) scores at 2 years.Timepoint: 2 years;Change from baseline in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores at 2 years.Timepoint: 2 years;To assess the change in 6-minute walk test at the end of 2 years of treatment as compared to baseline.Timepoint: 2 years;To assess the changes from baseline in HRCT chest patterns and quantitative HRCT scores for interstitial lung disease at the end of 2 years of treatment.Timepoint: 2 years;To assess the changes in ultrasonography of skin at the end of 2 years of treatment as compared to baseline.Timepoint: 2 years;To assess the changes on Echo (pulmonary artery hypertension) at the end of 2 years of treatment as compared to baseline.Timepoint: 2 years;To measure absolute and percentage change in pulmonary function tests (DLCO) from baseline to 2 years.Timepoint: 2 years

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr G Sethuraman

AIIMS, New Delhi, India

aiimsgsr@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026