Outcome of fixed bearing versus mobile bearing computer navigated unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Functional and radiological outcome of fixed bearing versus mobile bearing navigated unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic anteriomedial osteoarthritis: a randomized control trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/02/017761

Enrollment

Registered

2019-02-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M171- Unilateral primary osteoarthritisof knee

Interventions

Intervention1: GROUP A: PATIENTS UNDERGOING MOBILE BEARING NAVIGATED UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. Intervention2: GROUP B: PATIENTS UNDERGOING FIXED BEARING NAVIGATED UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. C

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All patients of age > 50yrs 2. Diagnosed with AMOA 3. Undergoing UKA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with Inflammatory arthritis of knee joint. 2. Patients with previous High Tibial Osteotomy or Tibial plateau fracture. 3. Patient with restrictive range of motion of 4. Patients with absent or severely damaged ACL and lateral compartment osteoarthritis. 5. Patients who have spinal, hips or neurological problems affecting gait. 6. Patients with symptomatic bilateral knee disease. 7. Patients who refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare functional and radiological outcome of navigated mobile bearing versus fixed bearing medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty.Timepoint: 6week, 6 month and 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess patient reported outcome in terms of functional improvement after surgery. To assess implant related complication rates in terms of timing, rates and reason for revision in study groups.To assess gait pattern between two study groups and postoperative improvement.To assess the survivorship of MB and FB UKA.To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of computer assisted navigation in unicondylar knee arthroplasty.To assess radiological outcome in between two study groups.Timepoint: 6week, 6 month and 1 year	—

Measure

Time frame

To assess patient reported outcome in terms of functional improvement after surgery. To assess implant related complication rates in terms of timing, rates and reason for revision in study groups.To assess gait pattern between two study groups and postoperative improvement.To assess the survivorship of MB and FB UKA.To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of computer assisted navigation in unicondylar knee arthroplasty.To assess radiological outcome in between two study groups.Timepoint: 6week, 6 month and 1 year

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactProf Rajesh Malhotra

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI

arpit19oct@gmail.com8130237652

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026