FindTrial
Sign In

A clinical study to evaluate the outcomes of singe lag screw and helical blade nailing in treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Study The Clinical And Radiological Outcomes Of Single Lag Screw Versus Helical Blade Cephalomedullary Nailing In The Treatment Of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017733
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S721- Pertrochanteric fracture

Interventions

Intervention1: Single Lag screw nailing: A single lag screw will be used in this group to treat intertrochanteric fractures. Control Intervention1: Helical blade nailing: In this group of patients Hel

Sponsors

Dr Arpan upadhayay
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with Intertrochanteric fracture presenting to the institution during this period. Low energy trauma Fracture less than 3 weeks old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age High velocity trauma Fractures due to pathological lesion in the proximal femur (Metastasis or primary bone tumors) Polytrauma Patients not giving consent Inability to walk prior to surgery Fractures more than 3 weeks old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the functional outcomes of single lag screw Versus helical blade cephalomedullary nailing in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures using Modified Harris Hip scoreTimepoint: 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess the effect of co morbidities on clinical and radiological outcome. 2. To assess the difference in pullout rate among both the implants. 3. To compare the change in neck shaft angle in both the implants. 4. To assess the relation between implant position and cut out rate. 5. To assess the difference in union rates using both the implants. 6. To assess the change in neck length after surgery between two groups Timepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arpan Upadhayay

AIIMS, New Delhi

arpannrsmc@gmail.com9163329438

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026