FindTrial
Sign In

Study for comparison of two types of suturing of abdominal wall muscle sheath in closing after emergency surgery for intestinal perforation

Comparison of Interrupted-X technique closure versus Conventional continuous closure of rectus sheath - A randomized control study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017688
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K631- Perforation of intestine (nontraumatic)

Interventions

Intervention1: Interrupted - X technique of suturing of rectus sheath: Interrupted - X technique of suturing of rectus sheath during abdominal wall closure of exploratory laparotomy for perforation pe

Sponsors

Dean Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing laparotomy for perforation peritonitis in emergency settings by midline incision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of previous midline laparotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PRIMARY OUTCOME -Incidence of wound dehiscence (Post-operative separation of musculo-aponeurotic layers of abdominal wall within 10 days of surgery).Timepoint: Patient will be assessed during postoperative period till discharge, and subsequent follow up at 2weeks and 1month of procedure—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
SECONDARY OUTCOME- Duration of hospital stayTimepoint: Till discharge—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBALAJI C

Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital

sushantoneogi@gmail.com9968604384

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026