Skip to content

A study to compare success using wet and dry graft in ear surgery

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY TO COMPARE SURGICAL OUTCOME USING WET AND DRY TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFT IN TYMPANOPLASTY TYPE I

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017654
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-02-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H66- Suppurative and unspecified otitismedia

Interventions

Intervention1: Tympanoplasty type I: Wet and dry temporalis fascia graft in Tympanoplasty type I Control Intervention1: wet and dry temporalis fascia graft: Wet and dry temporalis fascia graft in Tymp

Sponsors

JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cases of chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type with central perforation having no active discharge for a period of at least 6 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Cholesteatoma and granulation 2. Cases of retraction pocket/atelectatic ear. 3. Ossicular chain immobility or defect in ossicles 4. Revision cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the surgical outcome of tympanoplasty type I using dry and wet temporalis fascia graft.Timepoint: To evaluate and compare the surgical outcome of tympanoplasty type I using dry and wet temporalis fascia graft.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the surgical outcome of tympanoplasty type I using dry and wet temporalis fascia graft.Timepoint: The duration of study is of one year.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PC VERMA

JLN Medical college

shraddhsharma.sharma7@gmail.com7597425828

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026