Conventional versus self ligating Brackets:Treatment duration, root resorption and pain perception

Comparative evaluation of duration of extraction space closure & degree of root resorption with conventional brackets and self-ligating bracket

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/02/017647

Enrollment

Registered

2019-02-13

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Closure of extraction space using frictionless mechanics: Mushroom shaped retraction loop in Beta titanium CNA arch wires Control Intervention1: Closure of extraction space using fricti

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i.Permanent dentition ii. Angles Class I type 2 or Class II div 1 requiring extraction of first premolar iii. Symmetrical upper and lower arches iiii. Compliant patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Past History of any orthodontic treatment ii. Periodontally compromised dentition iii. Skeletal deformities and facial asymmetry iiii. Severe upper and lower crowding v. Medically compromised and syndromic patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Reduction in Duration of Space closureTimepoint: Reduction in Duration of Space closure	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Reduced root resorption and Pain perceptionTimepoint: Before and after en-mass retraction	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRaj Kumar Maurya

Army Hospital ( Research & Referral)

bracedbyraj@gmail.com

Outcome results