FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Blind technique with under Vision technique of placement of airway tubes(LMA) in children.

Comparison of blind technique with direct and video laryngoscope guided laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques in pediatric population- A Prospective Randomized Study - "VISION" trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017644
Enrollment
75
Registered
2019-02-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: CONTROL GROUP- STANDARD LMA INSERTION TECHNIQUE for GA. COMPARATOR GROUP-DL,direct laryngoscopic guided LMA insertion for GA. COMPARATOR GROUP- VL,video laryngoscopic guided LMA insert

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: pediatric patients,6 months TO 12 YEAR, ASA 1-2,both male & female, receiving general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway(LMA).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Oropharyngeal or laryngeal pathology 2. Upper respiratory tract infections on the day of surgery (i.e. cough, fever, rhinorrhea) 3. Anticipated difficult airway 4. Children at risk of aspiration (i.e. Gastrointestinal reflux disease) 5. Hiatus hernia, Lung diseases 6. Cardiorespiratory or cerebrovascular diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of malposition in Blind technique with Direct and Video laryngoscope guided Laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques in pediatric population with Flexible bronchoscopic assessment.Timepoint: After LMA placement, following induction of general anesthesia.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Number attempts for successful insertion 2. Time taken for insertion 3. Hemodynamic changes during insertion. 4. Oropharyngeal leak pressure 5. Complications during the insertion- airway injury, laryngospasm, desaturation (SpO290%). Timepoint: 1.Induction of general anesthesia and insertion of LMA. 2.Time from placement of LMA to successful placement 3.Till 5 minutes after placement of LMA. 4.After placement of LMA and initiation of mechanical ventilation. 5.At the completion of surgery and removal of LMA.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBikram Kishore Behera

AIIMS,Bhubaneswar

bikranbehera007@gmail.com9438884047

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026