FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two newer supraglotic devices for general anaesthesia in patients undergoing breast surgeries.

Comparative analysis of I-GEL versus BASKA MASK for general anaesthesia in patients undergoing breast surgeries.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017574
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-02-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C50-C50- Malignant neoplasms of breast

Interventions

Control Intervention1: I-GEL: Introduced after induction of anaesthesia. Control Intervention2: BASKA MASK: Introduced after induction of anaesthesia.

Sponsors

DR VIJAYMAHANTESH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients belonging to ASA physical status 1 and 2 Patients undergoing breast surgeries with controlled ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mouth opening BMI >30 kg/m2 Increased risk of aspiration Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
compare oropharyngeal sealing pressureTimepoint: Induction followed by insertion of the device.After confirming proper positioning of the device, sealing pressure is measured.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of Insertion Time for Insertion Number of Attempts Hemodynamic Parameters LaryngoPharyngeal Morbidity Airway Injuries.Timepoint: Intraoperative and Post operative period—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVIJAYMAHANTESH

Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology

namrang@gmail.com9880642830

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026