Skip to content

To compare the effect of movement in front of Mirror and Movement of affected hand on upper limb movement in paralytic patients.

Comparison between the effect of Mirror Therapy and Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on upper extremity motor function in sub acute stroke patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017488
Enrollment
36
Registered
2019-02-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Mirror Therapy: Mirror Therapy group will receive 1 hour of mirror therapy 5 days per week for 4 weeks.In first week patient will do ROM exercise of elbow,wist,hand and fingers.In 2nd a

Sponsors

Seema Sahu
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients diagnosed with MCA infarct, 2.Sub-acute stroke patients, 3.MMSE SCORE more than 24 out or 30, 4.Adequate vision and hearing, 5.Brunnstrom stage 2-4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of previous stroke or other neurological disease or disorder, 2.Participants with sever spasticity or flaccidity in upper limb.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Fugal Meyer Assessment(FMA) 2.Box and Block Test(BBT)Timepoint: Baseline assessment and after 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Box and Block Test(BBT)Timepoint: Baseline assessment and after 4 weeks of intervention

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSeema Sahu

MGM school of physiotherapy

ashwinikalept@yahoo.co.in7263891882

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026