Comparing two fillings for teeth with soft enamel

Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer cement for the restoration of molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralisation- a split mouth study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2019/02/017482

Enrollment

Registered

2019-02-05

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: ACTIVAâ?¢ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVEâ?¢: Manufactured by Pulpdent Control Intervention1: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GC Light-Cured Universal Restorative): Manufactured by GC

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Bilateral permanent first molars, diagnosed with Severe Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation, as per Alaluusuaâ??s criteria, in patients between ages 6 to 10, that are partially or completely erupted will be included in the study, after obtaining informed consent from the patientâ??s parents/guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Permanent first molars with enamel hypoplasia associated with syndromes, dental fluorosis, those with destroyed crowns, carious lesions, and those which are hypomineralised on only one side of the dental arch will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Colour match, anatomic contour, marginal integrity, cavosurface marginal discolouration, surface texture, secondary caries and gross fracture of the restorationTimepoint: 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Remineralisation in the tooth after placement of the bioactive restorationTimepoint: 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rashmi Nayak

Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal

kunalb.9993@gmail.com9740604048

Outcome results