Skip to content

Comparison of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction by two methods, all inside and outside in method.

Comparison of functional outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using all inside technique versus outside in technique â?? a double blind randomized controlled trial. - anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/02/017375
Enrollment
44
Registered
2019-02-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M968- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of musculoskeletal system, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: ALL INSIDE TECHNIQUE: . Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction uses various techniques like all inside technique that depends on the use of adjustable loop only or outside in technique with co

Sponsors

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES BHUBANESWAR
Lead Sponsor
DR PAULSON VARGHESE
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 - Patients with symptoms of knee pain or instability who are diagnosed as having ACL tear after clinical examination and confirmed with radiological investigations and diagnostic arthroscopy. 2 - Patients who have tried conservative treatment with hamstring exercises and failed to improve or improved partially 3 - Active, motivated patients aged between 20 to 60 years and belonging to either sex who are involved in heavy physical activities or athletic activities or patients who are unwilling to modify their present active life style 4- Associated with medial or lateral meniscus tear injuries. 5 - Patients who have recovered from the acute inflammatory stage of injury with return of full range of knee motion and decrease in swelling which usually takes 4 to 6 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1- Patients who are not falling in the above age group 2- Patients with associated injuries of lower limb (bony injuries or injuries involving other ligaments) and injury to spine 3- Patients who have radiological evidence of Grade III or IV osteoarthritis knee (Kellegren and Lawrence grading) 4- Patients requiring revision ACL reconstruction. 5- Patients with stiff knee or restricted range of motion 6- Patients having local skin lesion which is not amenable to any intervention 7- Patients who are not fit to undergo surgery from anesthesia point of view 8- Patients who are unwilling to give consent for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the functional outcome in terms of VAS score and lysholm score following surgery using all inside and outside in technique using endo button and bio screw.Timepoint: patients will be evaluated at 2 days,5 days,2 weeks 6 weeks and 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the results and outcome of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using all inside technique using adjustable loop with endobutton and outside in technique using endobutton and bio screw in terms of 1-post operative pain 2-Instability while walking 3- Postoperative complications Timepoint: patients will be evaluated at 2 days,5 days,2 weeks 6 weeks and 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PAULSON VARGHESE

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

bishnucolors@gmail.com9437182313

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026