FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison two devices placed in the throat in different head and neck position

Comparison of oropharygeal leak pressure between Largngeal mask airway Supreme and Ambu auragain in different head and neck position:A prospective Randomised study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/01/017224
Enrollment
180
Registered
2019-01-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R69- Illness, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A: LMA SUPREME: Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme SECOND GEneration lma with high sealing pressure Control Intervention1: Group B: Ambu aragain: AmbuAuragain second generation lma wit

Sponsors

sri ramachandra university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA BMI Elecive surgery requiring LMA use Elective surgery duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA >3 BMI >35KG/M2 cERVICAL sPONDYLOSIS pATHOLOGY OF NECK potential full stomach

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal Leak PressureTimepoint: neutral position neck flexion neck extension roation to left—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Peak airway pressure expired tidal volume end tidal carbon dioxide difference between inspred and expired volume difference between leak pressure and airway pressureTimepoint: neutral position neck flexion neck extension roation to left—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGowri Aishwarya

Sri Ramachandra medical college and research institue

makilandeswari@yahoo.com9840636238

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026