FindTrial
Sign In

A study to evaluate securing airway during surgery by different methods in different devices.

A comparative evaluation of maintaining cuff pressure using different techniques in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cuff versus polyurethane microcuff endotracheal tube.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/01/017170
Enrollment
80
Registered
2019-01-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal tube cuff inflated with air by auscultation of audible leak or PV loop closure.: PVC or polyurethane microcuff endotracheal tube cuff inflated with air by using audible lea

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology Pt BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III undergoing surgical procedure requiring intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Risk of pulmonary aspiration BMI >35 Obstetric patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Endotracheal tube Intracuff pressure Amount of air required to inflated cuffTimepoint: 1sec,1 hr , at the end of surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Air withdrawn from cuff Cuff volume before extubation Any secretions over distal cuff Complications-sore throat,hoarseness of voice,coughTimepoint: 1hr,at the end of surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhilasha

Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

pk.pgims@yahoo.com9416336901

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026