FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison between two Videolaryngoscope

A comparative evaluation of Airtraq and Hansraj video laryngoscopes, in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization- a randomized prospective study. - Airway

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2019/01/017042
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-01-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA Grade I and II

Interventions

Intervention1: Hansraj Videolaryngoscope: Measurement of Intubation difficulty scale(IDS) Control Intervention1: Airtraq optical videolaryngoscope: Measurement of Intubation difficulty scale(IDS)

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor
Obaid Ahmad Siddiqui
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I and II Age â?? 20 to 50 years Gender â?? both male and female BMI MMP Class â?? Class 1 & 2 Patient with chances of aspiration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Decreased inter-incisor distance ( Short thyromental distance ( Any Facial anomaly Fixed flexion deformity Patient at risk of pulmonary aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of Intubation difficulty scale(IDS)Timepoint: 2 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of the laryngoscopy attempt Duration of the tracheal intubation procedure The total time required to secure the airway The rate of successful placement of the TT in the trachea.Timepoint: 2 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSyed Moied Ahmed

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

sma99@rediffmail.com9897454739

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026